Matchup

Can the Intel UHD Graphics 770 run Layers of Fear (2016)?

No — under the minimum

No. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 doesn't reach the minimum graphics requirement for Layers of Fear (2016). Its 0 GB of video memory is under the 1 GB the minimum spec lists. It may not start, or run far below a playable frame rate.

Frame rate by resolution

  • 1080p 35 FPS on high 60 FPS on low
  • 1440p 22 FPS on high 60 FPS out of reach
  • 4K 13 FPS on high 60 FPS out of reach

Modelled at native resolution, paired with the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D or a faster processor. How the model works.

Next to the publisher’s spec

Minimum

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 1GB / Radeon R7 250X 1GB

Index
5
Video memory
1 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 770 falls short

Recommended

Publisher didn’t say

Index
5
Video memory
not stated
Intel UHD Graphics 770 falls short

Your card

Intel UHD Graphics 770

Index
3
Video memory
0 GB
FSR · XeSS

Same game, neighbouring cards

Intel UHD Graphics 770 and Layers of Fear (2016): questions

Can the Intel UHD Graphics 770 run Layers of Fear (2016)?

No. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 doesn't reach the minimum graphics requirement for Layers of Fear (2016). Its 0 GB of video memory is under the 1 GB the minimum spec lists. It may not start, or run far below a playable frame rate.

How many FPS does the Intel UHD Graphics 770 get in Layers of Fear (2016)?

Modelled on high settings without upscaling: 35 FPS at 1080p, 22 at 1440p and 13 at 4K, with a processor that meets the game's recommendation.

Which card would run Layers of Fear (2016) at the recommended spec?

The lowest launch price among recent cards that meet it belongs to the Intel Arc A310 ($99).

Does my processor change this?

The figures assume a processor at or above Layers of Fear (2016)'s recommendation. A slower one lowers the ceiling, most noticeably at 1080p.